Keywords: Mazda, Kompaktiškas transporto priemonės, Testai, veiksmingą važiavimo, Mazda2
Po pirmosios dalies bandymas buvo baigtas Mazda2 1,4 CRTD neatrodo, kad tokia maža vartojimo jos registracijos dokumentas pažadėjo. Pagal transporto priemonės registracijos dokumento vartojimui turėjo būti 4, 1 l/100 km, tačiau po bandymo ji buvo 6, 05 l/100 km. Aš nuolat tikisi kuro atsarga. Su partneriu ir kai bagažą paliko Mursijoje. Aš bandžiau, kad neturi viršyti 110 km / h ant kalvų ir 120 km / h lyguma (-8 km / h, realusis). Aš maniau, kad jis didelis vartojimas, nes jos ritmą. That is why I didn't diske su tuo pačiu greičiu. I didn't šviesos A / C, kol jis nėra būtinas, ji dirbo tik keletą kilometrų. Dėl kuro atstumas buvo 730 km nuo degalinės. Skaičius kuro atstumas buvo mažėja ir tiesiogiai proporcingas formą. Jis neatrodė, kad kompiuteryje buvo klaidingas ir lygio kuro, taip pat buvo mažėja. Mes įdiegėme buvo vartojančiomis viršija standartus. Atstumas iki Tuščias šoktelėjo iki 664 kilometrų. Kad kažkas buvo, kad wasMazda2 1,5 benzinas, kuriame yra 103 CV pagal testą. Tokiu modelio Atstumas iki Tuščias šoktelėjo iki 467 kilometrų.
I stopped in Le Roda (Albacete), 4 km after the fuel margin indicator jump. The mileometer showed 668,2 km, distance to empty was 59 km. It gave us 727, 2 km, with 43 liters average real consumption was 5,913 l/100 km. It is clear that the fuel margin of the car is very small. If we take 5,913 l/100 km as standard for it, fuel margin is only 3, 54 liters (proportionally). It is not the first diesel car that has less than 100 km in reserve, but nevertheless it seems ridiculous to me. I tested the pressures of the tires again. It was correct. The first 250 km of the test (approximately) I did them with 0, 3 bars below the recommended pressure, though they were pumped up earlier. The Repsol tyre pressure gage of M-50 concerning A-3 was wrong. I paid 18 euros for 20, 43 liters of fuel, it indicated throwback of consumption and it would remain a bit more. I stopped in the same petrol station where two years ago I stopped with Dacia Logan 1.4. Leaving La Roda, I did an experiment, instead of A-31 I continued my trip up to A-3, got into direction AP-36 to take the highway A-43. It is not a large short cut in distance, but the orography is much softer and the highway is better and there is less traffic. And the best thing of everything, the all the way is free. The fans of Formula 1 should go there. There is a village called Houses of Fernando Alonso, I swear it. Already in A-3, cross-over was painful. Asphalt happened to be awful, full of holes, and heavier traffic. At least, at this time of the day (20:00) lots of people do not drive with speed more than 150 km/h and give the lights if you take “their rail”. It was possible to drive 120 km/h and quite. My partner could affirm the difference in comfort of Mazda2 to similar cars. It is noisy. When I came to my destination place the tachometer showed 916, 4 kilometers, with 239 kilometers of estimated fuel margin. If we add to 43 initial liters 20, 43 filled ones, the average consumption happens to be about 5, 49 l/100 km. It is necessary to review that Mazda2 weight is 1.045 kg, it is very light. The comeback from Murcia was 108 km/h in average, a little less fast than average. In both trajectories the declared average consumption was 5, 1 l/100 km. If that was true the fuel distance of the car should be 843 km, approximately. What explanation can you give to this fact? I believe that it is quite probable that the diesel oil with which the car was delivered to me was not of good quality, and I threw normal diesel oil without any additive. It happens to me not for the first time. This result (5, 49 l/100 km) should not be taken as a fact with 100 % trustworthy. To be continued...
